Presto Agitato: Tortuous Searches

January 28, 2012

Tortuous Searches

Be warned: Roller queens know how to throw a punch:

A Manhattan lawyer filed suit yesterday against two ex-girlfriends — one a former ‘RollerJam’ star — over nasty comments they allegedly posted about him on the Web.

Matthew Couloute Jr. says the women’s ‘malicious statements’ at liarscheatersrus.com are killing his career by portraying him as a love-’em-and-leave-’em Lothario.

‘Our relationship didn’t last long, as I figured him out pretty quickly, but for others, BE FOREWARNED, HE’S SCUM. RUN FAR AWAY’, one of the anonymous posts reads.

Couloute’s Manhattan federalcourt filing demands unspecified money damages from ‘ex-lovers’ Stacey Blitsch and Amanda Ryncarz on grounds of ‘tortuous interference with prospective business relations’.

Well, I certainly hope he said ‘tortious interference’, otherwise he's a scumbag and a lousy lawyer.

Posted by Mike at 17:26 in Politics & Courts | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345172cc69e20167613fe54a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tortuous Searches:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by: |

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:

Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Post a comment

Recent Reading

Bernard Lewis: Islam: The Religion and the People
(2/22/2012) (*****)
Gordon K. Andersen: I Hate to Criticize, But... Professional Writers and Broadcasters Are Murdering the English Language
(2/5/2012) ‘Abusing the English language is like picking your nose in public. It usually does little harm, but it certainly does nothing toward enhancing your image.’ (****)
Barbara W. Tuchman: Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911-45
(2/3/2012) A monumental read! (At least, that's the usual euphemism for ‘Damn, that was big!’) But this is ‘Vinegar Joe’ Stilwell and Tuchman is brilliant as usual.

Tuchman doesn't think much more of ‘Generalissimo’ Chiang, of Chiang's field commanders, or of the British military leadership in CBI (the China-Burma-India theater of WWII) than did Gen. Stilwell, and the low opinion seems very well-deserved. ‘We can't’ is a lousy damned attitude to take when you desperately must, a point that was vividly made when first the Japanese going west and then Stilwell going east crawled through the eastern (Burmese) Himalayas with an intact, fighting army exactly as the Brits and the Chinese said couldn't be done. I don't think the Brit commanders ever forgave Stilwell for that one.

And Chiang demonstrated yet another shortcoming of nationalist fervor: Distrust of foreigners even when their interests clearly coincide with yours and you manifestly need their manpower and expertise is an entirely stupid and malignant attitude. (****)
Aristotle: The Organon (Logic)
(1/12/2012) (****)
Aristotle: The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle
(1/10/2012) (****)
Larry McMurtry: Lonesome Dove: A Novel
(1/8/2012) If you haven't read this, what are you waiting for? (*****)
Robert A. Heinlein: Double Star
(12/27/2011) (****)
Barbara W. Tuchman: The Zimmermann Telegram
(12/26/2011) (****)
Christopher Hitchens: Arguably: Essays by Christopher Hitchens
(12/23/2011) This is a collection of his essays he wrote for Slate, Vanity Fair, The Atlantic, etc. Damn, he will be missed! (*****)
Isaac Asimov: Second Foundation
(12/18/2011) (****)
William Manchester: The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill, Visions of Glory
(12/12/2011) (****)
Herman Melville: Moby-Dick
(11/14/2011) (****)
Jerry Pournelle: Birth of Fire
(11/6/2011) Mars is a Harsh Mistress? (For some reason, the nearby inhabitants of the Solar System are always rebelling against those fascist Earthlings.) Pournelle's physics is pretty good, here, but I haven't figured out why he had explosive lenses (i.e., an implosion core) in an enriched-uranium bomb. Everyone knows that's for plutonium bombs! (Yeah, yeah. I'm a nerd.) Still, I inhaled this book. Actually, I thought it was too short. I want more! (*****)
Stephen Kinzer: Reset: Iran, Turkey, and America's Future
(10/30/2011) Absolutely not recommended. It's possible that Kinzer's historical analysis is better the farther back he looks, but his view of the last forty years is so jaundiced that I doubt it and his impression of Iranian intentions is most kindly characterized as sophomore and naïve. I wish I had looked into Mr. Kinzer's professional history before I spent dear money on this tripe. (Another kindly chosen word.) (*)
Bhagavad-Gita
(10/28/2011) (**)